<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>RoboRealm Forum</title>
    <link>http://www.RoboRealm.com/</link>
    <description>The newest forum threads.</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:11:00 EST</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright: (C) RoboRealm, http://www.RoboRealm.com/</copyright>
    <docs>http://www.RoboRealm.com/</docs>

    <item>
        <title>No Title</title>
        <description>
        You are close. The module uses slightly different statistics but the idea is the same. The last angle ambiguity should be one of four 90 degree orientation. Ie a square should have straight edges but you are not sure which edge is the X or Y axis. The module deals with this by simply comparing all four orientations of a fiducial to that in the DB ... give that at this point you are not working with much information this is not too taxing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You may also need to use the Affine module to align the detected fiducial back to a square as apposed to a quadrilateral that may be rotated in X or Y.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;STeven.        </description>
        <link>http://www.roborealm.com/forum/index.php?thread_id=3674</link>
        <guid>http://www.roborealm.com/forum/index.php?thread_id=3674</guid>
        <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:11:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Trying to work out Fiducial module</title>
        <description>
        Hi STeven,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have been trying to reproduce the fiducial module so that I can explain it.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Your help file is super, and I looked at your references. &lt;br&gt;Here are my guesses so far:&lt;br&gt;First do thresholding and binarize the image.&lt;br&gt;Do a erode/dilate (or open) to clean up the image.&lt;br&gt;Then do a blob filter cutting on Min and Max size (as per the fiducial module) I also cut on Quadrilateral perimeter but this is just a guess? &lt;br&gt;This picks up the fiducial pretty well.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;Now I look at the Hu Moments and calculate the RMS between these and the hu moments of the of the training image.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I cut based on the sum of the RMS distances.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;The orientation of the image is pulled from the difference between the orientation moment of the image and the test image. &lt;br&gt;However, this doesn&apos;t fix the angle ambiguity problem.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Am I close?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Totally on the wrong track?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks!!!!!!&lt;br&gt;profmason        </description>
        <link>http://www.roborealm.com/forum/index.php?thread_id=3674</link>
        <guid>http://www.roborealm.com/forum/index.php?thread_id=3674</guid>
        <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:11:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>
